Tag Archives: excavation

Stonehenge excavations

Survey at StonehengeTrilithonSeiving at StonehengeArchaeologists toolsMegalith

Hung out to dryThe trenchInside the circleFinds

There aren’t many folk who can claim to have dug at Stonehenge (and I’m not one of them!) but I was lucky enough to see the ongoing excavations first hand this week. And i was only saying recently about getting up there to take some pictures! What a unique site and what a small trench; archaeology in a nutshell (or fish tank as one correspondant described it as groups of academics were shown round all day on Wednesday, completely diverting the site directors from their activities). Thanks to the directors for arranging for there to be such an open day (and providing such a truly fantastic opportunity for us researchers). Indeed the whole access to information side of things is exemplary: There are also big screens in the Timewatch tent showing live images from the trench providing even greater access not to mention the Smithsonian Magazine blog and BBC video blogs.

As regards the dig itself, it was interesting to see the bluestone socket and how deep it was (massive compared to the sarsen sockets, perhaps indicative of techniques more commonly applied to timber posts than stone settings) and entertaining to hear how pottery had been discovered in the backfill of the previous excavations (doh!). I was also surprised to learn that the concrete used in recent history to, ahem, shore up the monument was actually reinforced with steels, hence no decent magnetometer results within the circle. This recent history is equally as interesting as the prehistory!

The amount of disturbance to the bluestones is also fascinating and does suggest there is something special going on with them and different from other stones used in Stonehenge and other stone circles. Combined with the observation that most of the bluestones have in fact been removed totally from the site, this would suggest they were important enough to some people to invest considerable effort in their removal. And of course, transporting them from Wales in the first place was hardly a casual decision, involving considerable investment of time and energy. The idea that they had mysterious healing powers would go some way to explaining this unusual activity, why they were brought to the site in the first place and their subsequent role in activities at the site up to the present day.

It’s all go at the local pile of prehistoric rocks!

Stonehenge rock-art visit

Yes, that shining example of British archaeology we call Stonehenge is in the news a bit lately. The ongoing dig, a GPR survey, and publication of some BBC archive footage , not to mention a new book by Anthony Johnson which solves it all (presumably not the outstanding issues of chronology though). There hasn’t been this much activity at the henge in years! Not since they rebuilt the place in the 50’s. And the 60’s. Must get up there and take some photos; it is still open to the public whilst the dig is ongoing (the public, restricted to the circulatory path, never getting close to the henge itself anyway so not a problem for the excavations presumably).

The BBC footage in particular is great, showing the henge being dismantled and reassembled like a giant airfix model. Just goes to show how much work has been done previously and also how what we see today is rather different from what was there only a century ago. It’s plain to see in old paintings how much the henge has changed. Our view of the stones rarely takes into account all this modern reconstruction, preferring instead to think of the stones as immovable, permanent, deeply rooted in history rather than concrete. This recent history has been researched avidly by Brian Edwards who has published both on Stonehenge and also my favourite henge: Avebury, that fantastic 1930’s reconstruction (oh yes, Avebury too was pretty much rebuilt by Alexander Keiller, the marmalade magnate; there’s an excellent book on Keiller by Linda J Murray).

Getting back to current events, I for one can’t wait to see the results of the geophysics and excavations. Despite much effort over the years, Stonehenge is still largely a mystery and hopefully this programme of works will shed some new light on the chronology and development of the site if not settle the debate about what is was actually for; the A&E ward of the south-west, according to Darvill (quoted in the Guardian). It strikes me that this latest idea being proposed by Wainright and Darvill resonates of modern, alternative uses of the site (and so is bound to be very popular), although they are claiming ancient roots for this belief. The observation regarding the unusual concentration of injured bodies found in the area is also really rather interesting. I’m still thinking in terms of life and death, wood and stone, places for the ancestors and the living with spaces acting as social mediators, but the idea of healing practices forming some kind of link between life and death seems like a plausible starting point for some investigation.